Millions on aircraft.
Billions of dollars spent in Iraq.
Seeing your hard earned tax dollars at work. Priceless


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DqaWdkdFb3Y
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QEkYqL9n7vo
Kinda makes you think what kind of person the Secretary of Defense is! allowing the military branches to get rid of the best stuff out there with a replacement of nothing compared to... it's bull**** if u ask me!STRIKER wrote:And in a way, Viper, the F14 and the way they retired it is the same way the USAF is retiring the MH-53. Its still the biggest and badest Special Ops helo with no true replacement to its capabilities... Such a shame! Everytime I fly I take it all in cause these days are certainly numbered.
Its been happening for decades with our military so its nothing new. Case in point, the F-4 would still be a pretty leathal weapon with the right knucklebrain behind the controls. Same goes with the F-14. Yes its sad to see them go, but when you weigh maintenance costs vs. what it costs for the new technology, ive got to believe its more economical and safe for our country to keep going to new things, and different missions.PhnxBndt79 wrote:It stinks that something that has served its country for so long gets tossed along the side of the road like a piece of trash... It just makes me sick.
Same kind of deal was with the F-4 coming into the Navy....there was a Super Crusader(better version of standard crusaderRhino wrote:Its been happening for decades with our military so its nothing new. Case in point, the F-4 would still be a pretty leathal weapon with the right knucklebrain behind the controls. Same goes with the F-14. Yes its sad to see them go, but when you weigh maintenance costs vs. what it costs for the new technology, ive got to believe its more economical and safe for our country to keep going to new things, and different missions.
He said she said, its all a moot point. Cheney halted the production of further (D) models, he never said no go to development of the Super Tomcat or Tomcat 21, that was the 3 Secretaries of Defense under the Clinton administration (Les Aspin, William Perry, William Cohen). Believe me, the reduction in force at that time was major, all across the military. Also remember that the "mission" was/is changing. There was no need anymore for a long-range fleet defense fighter with the adaptation of the Aegis cruisers like there was in the cold war, which is what the Tomcat was born out of (remember it was never meant to be a "Bombcat"). Yes, its very sad to see the "Turkey" go, and maybe we should have held on to a squadron or two, but the F-14 is gone and you will likely not see one fly in the United States for a VERY long time, that is, until Dale Snodgrass gets his hands on one, but thats another story for another time.Viper101 wrote: Also, like everybody else Rhino, you think they killed the Tomcat because of its maintenance costs and hours...well guess what, it wasnt. The Navy could care less, just as long as the job was done and it was repaired. The F-14 was killed between a political debate which then led Dick Cheney (Secretary of Defense at the time) to kill it and make room for the less expensive and less powerful SH.