Once you declare an emergency then the pilot can do anything (within practical reason) to try to save the situation. He doesn't need ATC permission.
For example, if Capt Sullenberger had thought he could have safely made it back to La Guardia then he simply would have told ATC that was what he was going to do. ATC then would have cleared his path for him. They certainly would not have said he couldn't try it.
Flight 1549: US Airways goes down in Hudson River
Like Cobra said, the pilot may deviate from any rule to the extent required to meet that emergency. That doesn't mean act stupid or foolish, but basically allows the pilot to break flying rules if necessary for a safe as possible outcome. I think what you're asking is why did he (need to) communicate to ATC about landing in the Hudson? Well, he didn't need to, but kept ATC informed about the situation and where he was going (usually a key part to coordinate rescue efforts and set the wheels in motion). Secondly, he did "just do it" (i.e. land in the river). There was never any ATC clearance part of the ditching and the crew did what they needed to do to allow for the most sucessful outcome in a scenario that didn't present many other options.Sawamura wrote:Has the pilot not the right, to "request" an emergency landing in a river, or why didn't he just do it?
Sully & crew are real heroes because they're incredibly humble and "were just doing their jobs".
P.S. What is the cost of an Airbus 320? Let me Google that for you!
P.S. What is the cost of an Airbus 320? Let me Google that for you!
- Tailhook
- Virtual Thunderbird Alumnus
- Posts: 1052
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 3:17 pm
- Location: Baltimore, MD
Dude, that is awsome!Lawndart wrote:P.S. What is the cost of an Airbus 320? Let me Google that for you!

According to Wiki, an A320 is between $74-$80 million. Ok, I was a little off.

