Out of curiosity: why LOMAC?

Spac3Rat · Post by **Spac3Rat** » Sun Jul 17, 2005 4:22 pm

Why not Falcon 4? I was just wondering.

TBT_Piper · Post by **TBT_Piper** » Sun Jul 17, 2005 5:18 pm

Because F4 netcode isn't as good

Because Lomac looks better.

Because they have the right to choose.

Burner · Post by **Burner** » Sun Jul 17, 2005 6:50 pm

That pretty well sums it up.

USAF_Soldier · Post by **USAF_Soldier** » Sun Jul 17, 2005 7:35 pm

I give piper a Hand for that

STRIKER · Post by **STRIKER** » Sun Jul 17, 2005 8:38 pm

Couldnt have said it better myself Piper bud!

Dash · Post by **Dash** » Sun Jul 17, 2005 10:54 pm

I dunno, I always thought Silent Hunter III would have worked better for formation flying, but Lomac is good also

Actually, I was going to join a submarine formation float team a while back, but I didn't have the skills...

TBT_Piper · Post by **TBT_Piper** » Sun Jul 17, 2005 11:12 pm

USAF_Soldier wrote:I give piper a Hand for that

Does that come in Right?

USAF_Soldier · Post by **USAF_Soldier** » Mon Jul 18, 2005 2:04 pm

Does that come in Right?

what do u think

Post by **Lawndart** » Mon Jul 18, 2005 6:20 pm

...I'd second what Piper said before about Lock-On too! Netcode, visuals and our choice! Pretty much in that order too...

Spac3Rat · Post by **Spac3Rat** » Mon Jul 25, 2005 8:01 am

Ok guys. Just wondering.

Give it a go at Falcon: AF if you can. WAY better netcode, WAY better visuals (I love the new clouds)

TBT_Piper · Post by **TBT_Piper** » Mon Jul 25, 2005 11:40 am

Spac3Rat wrote:Ok guys. Just wondering.

Give it a go at Falcon: AF if you can. WAY better netcode, WAY better visuals (I love the new clouds)

Are you on Krack?

I have played AF. It sucks, the planes look like they are going 3 MPH and the views are FUBARed. Also the key commands suck and it isn't customizable with many things. Better visuals? ummmm the clouds suck ballz. Lomac has WAY better visuals. AF doesn't have smoke either.

Have a nice day, Do you even play lomac?

STRIKER · Post by **STRIKER** » Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:40 pm

I have been an avid falcon fan since falcon AT came out way back when and its netcode still needs plenty of work if it is to be even close to LOMAC. FS2004 and Falcon 4.0:AF do not compare to LOMAC on the formation flying scale....period.

Post by **Lawndart** » Mon Jul 25, 2005 9:04 pm

I've tried Falcon: Allied Force and although it's better than its predecessors, it's no where near where we need it to be. It doesn't help that the game is still based on code almost 8 years old either. This is coming from a guy who was and still is a huge Falcon simmer. Got my first copy of Falcon (the original one) in 1987! So, once again, not to shoot down the Falcon fans here, but Lomac is far better for what we do than Falcon can ever be in its current state!

SilverOne · Post by **SilverOne** » Mon Jul 25, 2005 9:57 pm

I only fly lo-mac for 4 days , and i can't explain it , the game is special somehow.

Spac3Rat · Post by **Spac3Rat** » Wed Aug 17, 2005 9:37 am

TBT_Piper wrote:Have a nice day, Do you even play lomac?

No. Not anymore. I felt was a bit too arcadish.