The most amazing craftmanship I have ever seen

Aviation & Simulation Topics
Post Reply
User avatar
Gunner
Virtual Thunderbird
Posts: 1190
Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2006 10:01 pm
Location: Phoenix, AZ

The most amazing craftmanship I have ever seen

Post by Gunner » Wed Dec 16, 2009 2:33 pm

This morning I followed a link on the SimHQ forum that took me to some of the most amazing work I have ever seen! I spent an hour browsing through the photos and thought I should share...I'm going to post a few of the photos here, but there are many more at the Craftsmanship Museum's website.
To go directly to Young Park's page, click here.

Just a few of the many photos of his models:

An overall view of the corsair. Part of one side is skinned while the other side is left as a cutaway so the viewer can see everything that goes on inside the airplane. The wings fold, the wheels and hook retract and the controls work. This aircraft took about 6000 hours over a period of 5 years to build. (Photo: Augie Salbosa)

Image

Using a tweezers, the controls can be moved. All cables and linkages are in place to work the wing control surfaces as well. Young Park has since carved a pilot's face and hands from solid aluminum and built an articulated pilot to sit in the cockpit. (Photo: George F. Lee, Honolulu Star-Bulletin)

Image

This second model is the same scale, but is built differently. For one, Mr. Park felt that his skills had increased in building the first model and he could make the second one better. On this one, the fuselage comes apart if five sections much like the real aircraft was built.

Image

A detail of the landing gear shows the many parts needed to get the gear to fold and rotate into position while the doors close into position. Slight depressions in the inside panels of the gear doors had to be made just like on the prototype so that the doors would close without hitting the tires.

Image

P-51 Mustang

The Mustang with gear up is one of the prettiest planes every designed. This model reproduces every detail inside and out down to the rivets.


Image

The Mustang with gear down can be seen with the first Corsair. Though built to the same 1/16 scale, the Mustang is a much smaller plane, adding to the difficulty of making everything fit inside.

Image

Though the engine doesn't run, it sure looks like it could. It is fully plumbed and, like the Corsair, all the cockpit controls are connected to the appropriate functions on the engine and control surfaces.

Image

Inside the left wing you can see the .50 cal ammunition threaded into the three wing guns. Each round is machined in 3 parts—brass cartridge with copper bullet and primer and is held together with a small copper feed jacket.

Image

Image

Each panel is hand formed over a wooden shape. The metal is annealed to the proper softness and then pounded and bent into shape. The plane is made up of many individual panels, and the fits between panels are just about perfect. (Y. Park photo)

Image

Here we see the panel above in it's final position. Looks easy now, doesn't it? (Y. Park photo)

Image

The form for the air intake and the final part. As is often the case in machining and model making, fixtures can take a long time to make and are never seen by the public viewing the finished model. (Y. Park photo)

Image

Many more photos here.
User avatar
Frazer
Posts: 507
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2005 8:47 am
Location: The Netherlands
Contact:

Post by Frazer » Wed Dec 16, 2009 3:06 pm

! :shock: !
User avatar
Teej
Virtual Thunderbird
Posts: 1533
Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2009 9:29 pm
Location: Milwaukee, WI

Post by Teej » Wed Dec 16, 2009 3:32 pm

6000 hours...he could've built himself a very nice airplane he could actually fly in for that kind of investment.

Probably cheaper, too. :D
User avatar
Burner
Virtual Thunderbird Alumnus
Posts: 1420
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 5:08 pm
Location: New Orleans, LA

Post by Burner » Wed Dec 16, 2009 4:19 pm

Wow :shock:
Image
Beaker
Posts: 611
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 12:19 am
Location: Colorado

Post by Beaker » Wed Dec 16, 2009 4:28 pm

Why? :o
Image
Post Reply