USAF Retiring for $bling$

Aviation & Simulation Topics
User avatar
Tailhook
Virtual Thunderbird Alumnus
Posts: 1052
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 3:17 pm
Location: Baltimore, MD

USAF Retiring for $bling$

Post by Tailhook » Mon Sep 11, 2006 9:28 pm

Yup, thats right you heard it right. The USAF is getting rid of and retiring all F-117's, B-52's, C-21's, U-2's for more F-22 Raptors!!!!!!!

All Stealths, Stratofortress's, etc will be OUT of the USAF by 2009!.

For more info:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=f-117+%2Bretire

Just read around!!!
Image
scooter
Posts: 80
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 12:32 am
Location: Murfreesboro, TN
Contact:

Post by scooter » Mon Sep 11, 2006 10:16 pm

Yup, thats right you heard it right. The USAF is getting rid of and retiring all F-117's, B-52's, C-21's, U-2's for more F-22 Raptors!!!!!!!

All Stealths, Stratofortress's, etc will be OUT of the USAF by 2009!.
No not quite...the article states that yes, USAF will be retiring all -117's and U-2's however only 38 of 76 C-21's and only 40% of the B-52 fleet.

Nevertheless it is clear that the F/A-22 will in fact be able to do the job faster and better than those aircraft being completly phased out.

Scooter
User avatar
Tailhook
Virtual Thunderbird Alumnus
Posts: 1052
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 3:17 pm
Location: Baltimore, MD

Post by Tailhook » Mon Sep 11, 2006 10:22 pm

still, for every 100+ million dollar project per unit of the F-117/U-2 and only alittle over 10 years of service in pure secrecy is just too fast! give the bomber some time cause it was a beast in Desert Storm!
Image
User avatar
STRIKER
Virtual Thunderbird Alumnus
Posts: 826
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 2:02 am
Location: Amarillo, TX

Post by STRIKER » Tue Sep 12, 2006 1:15 am

Tailhook,

Take a look at the a/c transitions from the late 40's to mid to late 60's ....dozens and dozens of a/c in and out of the service. The USAF cannot and will not remain stagnant with certain technologies. Buffs are a great example of the USA getting its dollars worth and most of the Buffs that are getting phased out are so old that the structural integrity of the bird just doesnt along it to fly anymore (SLEP...or Service life extension program just wont continue) whereas the F117 is late 70's technology bro and its time to move on since we have a far better replacement. In fact the F22 is replacing alot of the F15's and all the F117's is even better. Kills 2 birds with one stone.

Also, with the buffs...I think overal we have given that bomber plenty of "time" as you talked about.....you can only give that bird so many blood transfusions (upgrades), trust me...I continue to work and fly with 40 year old helicopters....talk about OLD. Finally, dont get stuck on how great the bird did in the gulf and things like that Tailhook. Thats great but if a better replacement comes along its time to move on. i.e. F-22 replacing the f117 and the B-2's/B-1's slowly replacing the B-52's (although they arent making anymore b-2's but that is another story.)
Image
User avatar
Lawndart
Virtual Thunderbird
Posts: 9290
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:36 am
Location: Mooresville, NC

Post by Lawndart » Tue Sep 12, 2006 1:49 am

Cost-effectiveness ratio and man-hours per flight hour as well as suitable technology for the role at hand are just a few factors that determine retiring an airframe and/or replacing it. It's only a matter of time before most wars are fought without pilots actually in the fighters...

All part of evolution and the F-22 is currently what's forcing other birds out of the skies. Literally and figuratively speaking!
Last edited by Lawndart on Tue Sep 12, 2006 1:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
Rhino
Posts: 746
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 1:40 am
Location: KDVN
Contact:

Post by Rhino » Tue Sep 12, 2006 1:50 am

Yea, the -117 can only carry 2 LGBs. I believe the Raptor has about the same Radar Cross Reference of the -117, and can carry a helluva lot more. Plus, why send a squadron of F-117's when you can send 1 B-2? :lol: :lol:

EDIT: Now that I think about it, the F-22, F-35, and the F/A-18 E/F/G will probably in all likelyhood be the last manned fighters that the US will ever produce!
Image
Phantoms Phorever!
User avatar
Tailhook
Virtual Thunderbird Alumnus
Posts: 1052
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 3:17 pm
Location: Baltimore, MD

Post by Tailhook » Tue Sep 12, 2006 10:22 am

Rhino wrote:Yea, the -117 can only carry 2 LGBs. I believe the Raptor has about the same Radar Cross Reference of the -117, and can carry a helluva lot more. Plus, why send a squadron of F-117's when you can send 1 B-2? :lol: :lol:
umm. #1 the F-117 is in pure secrecy to enemy radar and the B-2 is detectable. #2 F-117 does only carry 2 bombs in a bay for that reason. #3 F-22 can only carry 2 small smart bombs and 2 fuel tanks on its wings, but they are coming up with a multi-weapon pylon holder for 2 of each small JDAM...there might be more but I cant think of any
Image
Rhino
Posts: 746
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 1:40 am
Location: KDVN
Contact:

Post by Rhino » Tue Sep 12, 2006 12:41 pm

Viper101 wrote:the B-2 is detectable
Maybe in some little Flight Simulation of yours, but sorry, no. If the B-2 was detectable, there would have been about 4 of them laying on the ground all crumpled up the night "Shock and Awe" began in Baghdad.

Yes you are right when you say the F-22 can only carry two bombs now, but they are not small, being 1,000 LB JDAMs. In all reality as well, LGBs are probably going out the door, as we can now use GPS to get stuff done with the JDAMS, and not have to fool around lasing something before dropping. Just get the GPS coordinates, punch them in the weapons systems, fly the path the computer tells you to, and the bombs auto-release.

With that said, also remember, that the F-22 can go maybe 3x as fast as the F-117. Yes, we will all miss the Nighthawk, but its time is up.
Image
Phantoms Phorever!
User avatar
Tailhook
Virtual Thunderbird Alumnus
Posts: 1052
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 3:17 pm
Location: Baltimore, MD

Post by Tailhook » Tue Sep 12, 2006 1:46 pm

Rhino wrote:
Viper101 wrote:the B-2 is detectable

Yes you are right when you say the F-22 can only carry two bombs now, but they are not small, being 1,000 LB JDAMs.
Where you read it will carry 1,000 LB JDAM's? I'm just curious because from what I saw and looked at the pylon racks closely and looked like it couldnt support something of that.
Image
Rhino
Posts: 746
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 1:40 am
Location: KDVN
Contact:

Post by Rhino » Tue Sep 12, 2006 3:14 pm

http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ ... eapons.htm

A good source of info is globalsecurity.org
You might find some answers there as well as other info regarding stealth and other weapons systems.
Image
Phantoms Phorever!
User avatar
lqcorsa
Posts: 439
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2005 2:31 am
Location: Seattle, WA

Post by lqcorsa » Wed Sep 13, 2006 10:48 am

the F/A-18 E/F/G will probably in all likelyhood be the last manned fighters that the US will ever produce!
Huh? What? F/A-18 Who? Hey I'm fine with that :D 8)
Pluss with the new radar going into the hornet, it's has yet another "blood transfusion" coming it's way".
User avatar
Tailhook
Virtual Thunderbird Alumnus
Posts: 1052
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 3:17 pm
Location: Baltimore, MD

Post by Tailhook » Wed Sep 13, 2006 8:45 pm

If you haven't read, the F/A-18A-G project will shut down by 2012 and go right to the F-35.
Last edited by Tailhook on Fri Jun 13, 2014 9:08 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image
Rhino
Posts: 746
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 1:40 am
Location: KDVN
Contact:

Post by Rhino » Thu Sep 14, 2006 1:01 am

Yes, they will stop PRODUCING THEM, but not stop using them. They will likely use them for more than 20-30 years.
Image
Phantoms Phorever!
User avatar
lqcorsa
Posts: 439
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2005 2:31 am
Location: Seattle, WA

Post by lqcorsa » Thu Sep 14, 2006 10:39 am

As long as there a hornets in the sky, I'm happy. The tomcat reminds me of old people, classical music, some people just gotta move on...

I haven't heard anybody explain why they dis-like the hornet and prefer the tomcat. Viper, please explain.
User avatar
Cobra
Virtual Thunderbird Alumnus
Posts: 1057
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 6:41 pm
Location: OZ

Post by Cobra » Thu Sep 21, 2006 11:26 pm

As far as B2 detectability is concerned, rumour has it that the Aussie developed Jindalee OTHR (over the horizon radar) system can indeed detect the B2 and any other stealth aircraft. It does this by detecting the turbulence created by the passage of the aircraft.
Image
Post Reply