Page 2 of 2

Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2009 10:48 pm
by Tailhook
Luse check PM's.

Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2009 10:56 pm
by Luse
Guilty conscience?

That was not the intention of my post, I was just stating that by not releasing it he can do whatever he wants to the model, as long as it stays on his computer, and seeing as how Lock on multilayer can not transfer files, he will be fine.

-Luse

Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2009 11:02 pm
by Blaze
Anyways back OT, has anyone else had a chance to try out the Viper in FSX yet? IRIS and Triple-Six did a great job adding as much detail as possible while using as minimal polys as possilbe, giving a great model with high-fps performance. Externally the model is highly accurate, and the VC, while not as good as the Aerosoft F-16's, is still very detailed and has every switch where it should be. Overall great job. Definitely recommend it! 8)

Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2009 11:11 pm
by Luse
Just purchased it bud, Highly Recommended, I just wish the "good" addon companies would pick it up and model a correct Blk 52. 8)

Posted: Tue Aug 25, 2009 6:17 pm
by Blaze
Few more shots.

Image
Image
Image

8)

Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2009 2:54 pm
by Rhino
Gonna have to call a "fail" on those tanks too.

Here's the real family model (Block 32, but the tanks are the same).

Image

Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2009 3:06 pm
by Panther
Yes, FAIL because those are not tanks under the wing. Those are called traveling pods where the pilots store their luggage/golf clubs/beer etc.

Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2009 3:41 pm
by Tailhook
Beautiful model. 8)

Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2009 4:46 pm
by Sweeper
Panther wrote:Yes, FAIL because those are not tanks under the wing. Those are called traveling pods where the pilots store their luggage/golf clubs/beer etc.
Wow, didn't know that! Amazing! :D

But nice model :)

Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2009 6:32 pm
by Lawndart
Gotta say they did a nice job on the skin, but I'm also noticing some additional discrepancies.

Ocho following el ocho...
Image