Santa Claus: An Engineer’s Perspective

Sit Back, Relax and Chat about Anything
Post Reply
User avatar
Lawndart
Virtual Thunderbird
Posts: 9290
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:36 am
Location: Mooresville, NC

Santa Claus: An Engineer’s Perspective

Post by Lawndart » Fri Dec 21, 2012 2:53 pm

To prove that engineers have a sense of humor, I send you the following. I wish I could say I wrote it, but I didn’t, and don’t know who did. Perhaps you’ve seen it before. If not, enjoy.


Santa Claus: An Engineer’s Perspective

There are approximately two billion children (persons under 18 years old) in the world. However, since Santa does not visit children of Muslim, Hindu, Jewish or Buddhist (except maybe in Japan) religions, this reduces the workload for Christmas night to 15% of the total, or 378 million (according to the population reference bureau).

At an average (census) rate of 3.5 children per household, that comes to 108 million homes, presuming that there is at least one good child in each.

Different time zones and the rotation of the earth, assuming he travels east to west (which seems logical), this works out to 967.7 visits per second.

This is to say that for each Christian household with a good child, Santa has around 1/1000th of a second to park the sleigh, hop out, jump down the chimney, fill the stockings, distribute the remaining presents under the tree, eat whatever snacks have been left for him, get back up the chimney, jump into the sleigh and get on to the next house.

Assuming that each of these 108 million stops is evenly distributed around the earth (which, of course, we know to be false, but will accept for the purposes of our calculations), we are now talking about 0.78 miles per household; a total trip of 75.5 million miles, not counting bathroom stops or breaks.

This means Santa’s sleigh is moving at 650 miles per second, 3,000 times the speed of sound. For purposes of comparison, the fastest manmade vehicle, the Ulysses space probe, moves at a poky 27.4 miles per second, and a conventional reindeer can run (at best) 15 miles per hour.

The payload of the sleigh adds another interesting element. Assuming that each child gets nothing more than a medium sized Lego set (two pounds), the sleigh is carrying over 500 thousand tons, not counting Santa himself. On land, a conventional reindeer can pull no more than 300 pounds. Even granting that the “flying” reindeer could pull ten times the normal amount, the job can’t be done with eight or even nine of them. Santa would need 360,000 of them. This increases the payload, not counting the weight of the sleigh, another 54,000 tons, or roughly seven times the weight of the Queen Elizabeth (the ship, not the monarch).

600,000 tons traveling at 650 miles per second creates enormous air resistance. This would heat up the reindeer in the same fashion as a spacecraft reentering the earth’s atmosphere. The lead pair of reindeer would absorb 14.3 quintillion joules of energy per second each. In short, they would burst into flames almost instantaneously, exposing the reindeer behind them and creating deafening sonic booms in their wake.

The entire reindeer team would be vaporized within 4.26 thousandths of a second, or right about the time Santa reached the fifth house on his trip.

Not that it matters, however, since Santa, as a result of accelerating from a dead stop to 650 m.p.s. in .001 seconds, would be subjected to acceleration forces of 17,500 g’s. A 250 pound Santa (which seems ludicrously slim) would be pinned to the back of the sleigh by 4,315,015 pounds of force, instantly crushing his bones and organs and reducing him to a quivering blob of pink goo.

Therefore, even if Santa did exist, he’s dead now.

Merry Christmas!
User avatar
Ray
Virtual Thunderbird
Posts: 728
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2009 1:21 am
Location: Las Vegas, NV

Post by Ray » Sat Dec 22, 2012 12:14 pm

That's a great read - laughed out loud a few times, especially the last two paragraphs. :lol:
Sawamura
Posts: 154
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 4:01 pm
Location: Germany

Post by Sawamura » Sat Dec 22, 2012 12:16 pm

:lol:

Merry Christmas. :mrgreen:
Image
User avatar
Teej
Virtual Thunderbird
Posts: 1533
Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2009 9:29 pm
Location: Milwaukee, WI

Post by Teej » Sat Dec 22, 2012 6:56 pm

600,000 tons traveling at 650 miles per second creates enormous air resistance.
Pffft. I'm calling fake.

Any engineer would know that wind resistance would vary with volume and shape (Cd) - mass/weight are irrelevant to how much drag / "air resistance" is generated (though of course would factor into any calculations of acceleration resulting from that drag.)

;)

Edit: Strange. I put in parenthesis above the abbreviation for drag coefficient - upper case C, lower case d. Verified when I look at this post in edit mode. In normal viewing or in "quote" mode, the forum is showing both uppercase. :?
Post Reply